Regulation of glut1 mRNA by Hypoxia-inducible Factor-1

By Changhu Chen, N. Pore, A. Behrooz, F. Ismail-Beigi, A. Maity. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2001

773 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Oncogenic transformation and hypoxia both induceglut1 mRNA. We studied the interaction between theras oncogene and hypoxia in up-regulating glut1mRNA levels using Rat1 fibroblasts transformed with H-ras (Rat1-ras). Transformation with H-ras led to a substantial increase in glut1mRNA levels under normoxic conditions and additively increasedglut1 mRNA levels in concert with hypoxia. Using a luciferase reporter construct containing 6 kilobase pairs of theglut1 promoter, we showed that this effect was mediated at the transcriptional level. Promoter activity was much higher in Rat1-ras cells than in Rat1 cells and could be down-regulated by cotransfection with a dominant negative Ras construct (RasN17). A 480-base pair (bp) cobalt/hypoxia-responsive fragment of the promoter containing a HIF-1 binding site showed significantly higher activity in Rat1-ras cells than in Rat1 cells, suggesting that Ras might mediate its effect through HIF-1 even under normoxic conditions. Consistent with this, Rat1-ras cells displayed higher levels of HIF1-α protein under normoxic conditions. In addition, a promoter construct containing a 4-bp mutation in the HIF1 binding site showed lower activity in Rat1-ras cells than a construct with an intact HIF1 binding site. The activity of the latter construct but not the former could be down-regulated by RasN17, supporting the importance of the HIF1 binding site in regulation by Ras. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor LY29004 down-regulated glut1 promoter activity and mRNA levels under normoxia and also decreased HIF1α protein levels in these cells. Collectively these results indicate that H-Ras up-regulates theglut1 promoter, at least in part, by increasing HIF-1α protein levels leading to transactivation of promoter through the HIF-1 binding site.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93665482cee5308a4dbb59f2ed9f2d5bb6699322

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cancer Research

  1. C. V. Dang
  2. Jung-whan Kim
  3. Robert James Gillies
  4. Robert A. Gatenby
  5. G. Semenza
  6. J. Pouysségur
  7. M. López-Lázaro
  8. Ralph J. Deberardinis

In Molecular Biology

  1. C. V. Dang
  2. Jung-whan Kim
  3. Robert James Gillies
  4. Robert A. Gatenby
  5. G. Semenza
  6. J. Pouysségur
  7. M. López-Lázaro
  8. Ralph J. Deberardinis

Citations in the corpus