Knowledge networks in local and global space

By A. Lorentzen. 2008

143 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/934cfa230371c0d3e13224ea61956cebd4ca88ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Piers Thompson
2. Andrew Johnston
3. Robert Huggins
4. Daniel Prokop
5. Arnaldo Camuffo
6. Roberto Grandinetti
7. Yee Kwan Tang
8. E. Malecki

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Piers Thompson
2. Robert Huggins
3. Andrew Johnston
4. Arnaldo Camuffo
5. Roberto Grandinetti
6. Ron A. Boschma

In Strategy and Management

1. Piers Thompson
2. Robert Huggins
3. Andrew Johnston
4. Daniel Prokop
5. Arnaldo Camuffo
6. Roberto Grandinetti
7. E. Malecki
8. Ross Brown

Citations in the corpus

• Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: The influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size (2010, background): “The key aspect of these developments is that the knowledge base of the world’s most advanced local and regional economies is no longer necessarily local, but positioned within global knowledge networks (Wolfe and Gertler 2004; Huggins and Izushi 2007; Lorentzen 2008).”
• Italian industrial districts as cognitive systems: Are they still reproducible? (2011, background): “A discontinuity of this nature and scope could not but challenge the IDs, or rather the systems of production, which for a long time have managed to maintain a competitive advantage also, thanks to their relative cognitive self-sufficiency (Zucchella 2006; Lorentzen 2008).”
• Network Capital, Social Capital and Knowledge Flow: How the Nature of Inter-organizational Networks Impacts on Innovation (2012, background): “…network development, there is an increasing emphasis on the importance of understanding networks and knowledge flows in an environment that is simultaneously local and global (Andersson and Karlsson, 2007; Lorentzen, 2008; Van Geenhuizen, 2008; Maggioni and Uberti, 2009; Broekel and Boschma, 2011).”
• Entrepreneurship, innovation and regional growth: a network theory (2015, background): “The key aspect of these developments is that the knowledge base of the world’s most advanced local and regional economies is no longer necessarily local, but positioned within global knowledge networks (Wolfe and Gertler 2004; Huggins and Izushi 2007; Lorentzen 2008).”
• A Network-based view of regional growth (2014, background): “Karlsson, 2007; Lorentzen, 2008; Van Geenhuizen, 2008; Maggioni and Uberti, 2009; Broekel and Boschma, 2011; Laursen et al, 2011).”
• Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality (2019, background): “…of many advanced regional economies is no longer necessarily local, but also positioned within more regionally open innovation and knowledge networks (Wolfe and Gertler 2004; Huggins and Izushi 2007; Lorentzen 2008; Cappellin and Wink 2009; Fitjar and Rodriguez-Pose 2011; Capello and Camilla 2013).”
• Spatial concentration and location dynamics in logistics:the case of a Dutch province (2013, unknown): “However, the central role of regional knowledge networks has also been critized (Lorentzen, 2008) and it has become clear that distant knowledge sources may be equally or even more relevant as ’local buzz’ (see e.g. Bathelt et al., 2004).”