A review of soft consensus models in a fuzzy environment

By Enrique Herrera-Viedma, F. Cabrerizo, Janusz Kacprzyk, Witold Pedrycz. Information Fusion, 2014

677 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9334a65bb0700f70bd3f2cab6be1388e0d8bab12

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust (2018, unknown): “Using this interaction information, a trust relationship between users can be constructed, which should be considered as a reliable resource in the interaction process of GDM [22].”
Trust based consensus model for social network in an incomplete linguistic information context (2015, background): “On the other hand, another key issue in this type of decision making problem is how to reach consensus to derive the decision solution [6] [28].”
Double hierarchy hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set and MULTIMOORA method: A case of study to evaluate the implementation status of haze controlling measures (2017, unknown): “Furthermore, DHHFLTSs can be used to deal with new decision making model such as consensus model [45,46] , large scale decision making model [47] , etc. Additionally, these research results can be applied to deal with some practical problems such as medical management, water resource management,…”
Large-scale group decision making model based on social network analysis: Trust relationship-based conflict detection and elimination (2019, background): “at obtaining a collective solution as close as possible to unanimous agreement [6, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18].”
Consensus Building for the Heterogeneous Large-Scale GDM With the Individual Concerns and Satisfactions (2018, methodology): “Therefore, a soft consensus measure has been widely employed in the CRP [4], [26], [30], [41], [65].”
Consensus reaching in social network group decision making: Research paradigms and challenges (2018, methodology): “This is considered an iterative and dynamic process leading to the final group consensus based solution after multiple rounds of discussions and modifications [3,4,5].”
The consensus models with interval preference opinions and their economic interpretation (2015, background): “, super-individual defined by [14]) who dominates the whole process of consensus reaching and has strong team leadership and communication skills to convince individuals to change their opinions into an acceptable option [12,14].”