The consensus models with interval preference opinions and their economic interpretation

By Zaiwu Gong, Xiaoxia Xu, Huanhuan Zhang, U. A. Ozturk, Enrique Herrera-Viedma, Chao Xu. 2015

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Consensus Building for the Heterogeneous Large-Scale GDM With the Individual Concerns and Satisfactions (2018, unknown): “Based on the use of a soft consensus measure, a large number of CRPs have been reported, and they can be mainly classified in to the following types: 1) CRPs under different preference representation structures [5], [8], [16], [27], [31], [37], [50], [54], [56]; 2) CRPs with minimum adjustments or c”
A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust (2018, background): “A more reasonable policy is possible and desirable by which the inconsistent users can decide to implement or not the recommendation advices provided to him/her based on the affordability of their adjustment cost [17, 18, 44, 47].”
Integrating experts' weights generated dynamically into the consensus reaching process and its applications in managing non-cooperative behaviors (2016, background): “Based on a “soft” consensus level, different types of CRPs have been proposed: (i) CRPs under different preference representation formats [10,13,15,17,28,35, 55]; (ii) CRPs with minimum adjustments or cost [5,6,12,16,22,23,66, 68,69]; (iii) CRPs based on consistency and consensus measures [18, 20,25”