Understanding Policy Coherence: Analytical Framework and Examples of Sector–Environment Policy Interactions in the EU

By Mans Nilsson, T. Zamparutti, J. Petersen, Björn Nykvist, Peter M. Rudberg, J. McGuinn. 2012

485 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/932a09d85cffb0f4ea46eeb3a20cdede5a44f475

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis (2016, background): “…why new instruments supporting niches may be added to those supporting existing regimes instead of replacing them (Kern and Howlett, 2009).17 By policy implementation we mean “the arrangements by authorities and other actors for putting policy instruments into action” (Nilsson et al., 2012; Fig.”
The Emergent Network Structure of the Multilateral Environmental Agreement System (2013, methodology): “, Keohane and Victor, 2011; Young, 2011), in that integration generally involves interplay management towards policy coherence (Nilsson et al., 2012).”
The need for comprehensive and well targeted instrument mixes to stimulate energy transitions: The case of energy efficiency policy (2017, unknown): “[44]) and means that policy makers are struggling to support non-standard energy efficiency measures.”
The environmental state and the glass ceiling of transformation (2020, background): “On the other hand, more direct and deliberative forms of decision making in fields of socio-ecological transition may undermine policy coherence (Nilsson et al. 2012) and increase the role of ‘populism’ in these fields (Beeson 2019, Blühdorn and Butzlaff 2019).”
Climate change and the water–energy–food nexus: insights from policy and practice in Tanzania (2018, background): “Gomar, Stringer, and Paavola (2014), Di Gregorio et al. (2017) and Nilsson et al. (2012) all see a need for horizontal coordination in addition to vertical policy coherence, and OECD (2014) emphasizes the need for an effective institutional structure to facilitate this.”
Managing the food, water, and energy nexus for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in South Asia (2016, background): “More importantly, greater policy coherence among the three sectors will be critical for moving towards a more efficient, equitable, and sustainable use of resources (Nilsson et al., 2012).”