Global Capital, Political Institutions, and Policy Change in Developed Welfare States

By Daniel Wincott. 2003

496 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/930eb7a436f1af39415b0de8e5f47e4abcccebde

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

Citations in the corpus

A long goodbye to Bismarck? The politics of welfare reform in Continental Europe (2008, unknown): “While many studies refer to the explanatory power of the macroinstitutional context of decision-making, notably the number of veto points in an electoral system (Immergut 1992; Swank 2002), more recent studies also point to the micro-institutions of the Bismarckian welfare system as variables shapin”
Workers, worries and welfare states: Social protection and job insecurity in 15 OECD countries (2007, background): “Given the centrality that such reasoning has come to assume, the absence of any systematic analysis of the effects of social protection on individual perceptions of economic insecurity is striking.”
Why is there no race to the bottom in capital taxation (2009, methodology): “most prominently described by Frey (1990), Scharpf (1997), and Tanzi (1995).”
Flexible Fiscal Rules and Countercyclical Fiscal Policy (2016, background): “…fiscal rules, as it implies a stronger vertical separation of power (Gerring and others, 2005) and a stronger interest in controlling negative fiscal spillovers across government levels through binding constraints on their respective fiscal discretion (Huber and others, 1993; and Swank, 2002).”
Inequality, Public Opinion and Redistribution (2007, background): “Each of these developments likely contributed to pressure on policy makers to reduce the generosity of redistributive programs and/or weakened the political base supporting maintenance or expansion of such programs (Hicks, 1999; Huber and Stephens, 2001; Swank, 2002).”
Globalization and the welfare state: a retrospective (2004, unknown): “…factors have been discussed from this perspective: the type of welfare regime (Scharpf 2000; Hemerijck 2002), the structure of political institutions (Swank 2002), the political power of the left (Garrett 1998b), the production regime (Hall and Soskice 2001), religious legacies (Block 2003).”
Partisanship, Trade Policy, and Globalization: Is There a Left–Right Divide on Trade Policy? (2004, background): “Others , in particular Garrett ( 1998 ) and Swank ( 2002 ) , argue that globalization is not shrinking partisan differences , but is perhaps even increasing them .”