Predicting the evolution of sexual size dimorphism

By Jeff P. Reeve, D. Fairbairn. 2001

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9305cc7c122dd7ca1f8da0fbf86a0bde1dc14fc8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Theodore Garland Jr.
2. Richard J. Smith
3. James M. Cheverud
4. C. Oufiero
5. J. Husak
6. T. Holliday
7. J. Swallow
8. Anthony R. Ives

In Genetics

1. C. Oufiero
2. Theodore Garland Jr.
3. Richard J. Smith
4. James M. Cheverud
5. Liam J. Revell
6. Dale R. Nyholt
7. Luis V. García
8. Anthony R. Ives

Citations in the corpus

• Scaling of Sexual Dimorphism in Body Mass: A Phylogenetic Analysis of Rensch's Rule in Primates (2002, methodology): “Justifications for the procedures that we used were discussed at length by Smith (1999). We calculated the correlation and regression between SSD and size via 3 methods, traditional interspecific allometry, phylogenetically independent contrasts, and phylogenetic autocorrelation. Gittleman and Luh (”
• Evaluating performance costs of sexually selected traits (2007, background): “…within populations (see review by Badyaev 2002), which should tend to inhibit sexual divergence in body size (Lande 1980), but both empirical and theoretical studies suggest that this will not always be a strong constraint on the evolution of sexual dimorphism (Reeve & Fairbairn 1996, 2001).”