Scaling of Sexual Dimorphism in Body Mass: A Phylogenetic Analysis of Rensch's Rule in Primates

By Richard J. Smith, James M. Cheverud. International journal of primatology, 2002

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bbfe3267a5fe1a363a09dfc938d2a4bccf628f3f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Anthony R. Ives
2. Simon P. Blomberg
3. Theodore Garland Jr.
4. E. Rezende
5. A. F. Bennett
6. W. E. Snyder
7. J. Husak
8. B. Cardinale

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Anthony R. Ives
2. Theodore Garland Jr.
3. Simon P. Blomberg
4. E. Rezende
5. A. F. Bennett
6. J. Husak

In Social Psychology

1. Anthony R. Ives
2. Theodore Garland Jr.
3. Simon P. Blomberg
4. E. Rezende
5. A. F. Bennett

Citations in the corpus

• Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology (2005, methodology): “…and Adolph, 1994; Sanford et al., 2002), but are also employed to analyze the effects of sexual selection (e.g. Hosken et al., 2001; Nunn, 2002; Smith and Cheverud, 2002; Aparicio et al., 2003; Cox et al., 2003), which may be nonadaptive or even maladaptive with respect to natural selection.”
• Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods (2002, background): “Various other studies have also purported to find evidence for a phylogenetic ‘effect’ on dimorphism in body size (e.g. Smith & Cheverud, 2002).”
• Time allocation and the evolution of group size (2008, unknown): “We used the Smith & Cheverud (2002) primate phylogeny and branch lengths, supplemented with data from Purvis (1995), Nagamachi et al. (1999), de Oliveira et al. (2002), Cortes-Ortiz et al. (2003) and de Lima et al. (2007).”
• Comparative tests of reproductive skew in male primates: the roles of demographic factors and incomplete control (2006, unknown): “The second phylogeny was based on Smith and Cheverud (2002), with supplemental information of phylogeny among Macaca species from Morales and Melnick (1998) and Li and Zhang (2005).”
• TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE (2003, methodology): “Subsequently, Gittleman and coworkers have applied the phylogenetic autocorrelation method to a large number of comparative datasets (e.g., Geffen et al. 1996; Gittleman et al. 1996a,b; Gittleman and Van Valkenburgh 1997), as have others (e.g., Morales 2000; Smith and Cheverud 2002).”