Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation

By J. Canadell, M. Raupach. Science, 2008

1,353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92dcf3048c4502715b8164d4a48961858edcfe17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Increased forest biomass production in the Nordic and Baltic countries – a review on current and future opportunities (2016, background): “In addition, the forest biomes may be under extended focus with respect to climate change mitigation as they have many roles in this context (Canadell and Raupach 2008).”
Diversity and competition influence tree allometric relationships – developing functions for mixed‐species forests (2017, background): “This carbon sequestration function makes a valuable contribution to climate change protection (Canadell et al. 2007; Canadell & Raupach 2008) and economic incentives have been devised to encourage practices that increase forest carbon sequestration (Agrawal, Nepstad & Chhatre 2011).”
Biodiversity in forest carbon sequestration initiatives: not just a side benefit (2009, background): “On the other hand, old-growth forest ecosystems — on which the major efforts of REDD are focused [14 ,15,16] — tend to be dominated by large-sized, slow-growing species and large, slow-moving carbon stocks (right hand side of Figure 2).”
Host range expansion of native insects to exotic trees increases with area of introduction and the presence of congeneric native trees (2015, background): “A new wave of planting exotic trees is currently taking place, partly in response to the challenges associated with climate change (Canadell & Raupach 2008).”
The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota (2011, background): “…in terrestrial ecosystems has emerged as an important issue in international climate negotiations and there is great interest in giving climate change mitigation credit to land use or land management that results in higher levels of carbon storage (e.g., Angelsen 2008; Canadell and Raupach 2008).”
Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico (2009, background): “Land-use practices such as afforestation, reforestation, natural regeneration of forests, silvicultural systems and agroforestry can help reducing CO2atm concentrations (Brown 1996; Canadell and Raupach 2008).”
Negative emissions—Part 2: Costs, potentials and side effects (2018, background): “the cumulative removal is large-scale, up to about 500 GtCO2, andhence is associated witha sharpdecline of atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Uncertainty surrounding the development and implementation costs of this technology currently remains a major barrier (see section 3.3). Finally, Strefler et al ”
The road to achieving the long-term Paris targets: energy transition and the role of direct air capture (2017, background): “2014) and that of afforestation (Canadell and Raupach 2008; IPCC 2007; Obersteiner et al. 2006; Humpenoeder et al. 2014) have been largely analysed in the literature since they are arguably considered the most attractive options to realise negative carbon emissions.”
Ips typographus and Dendroctonus ponderosae Models Project Thermal Suitability for Intra- and Inter-Continental Establishment in a Changing Climate (2019, background): “Multiple factors affect in situ forest carbon storage capacity including tree growth and decay rates, management, and tree mortality due to deforestation and natural disturbances (Breshears and Allen, 2002 Li et al., 2003; Canadell and Raupach, 2008).”