PATTERNS IN CRIMINAL ACHIEVEMENT: WILSON AND ABRAHAMSE REVISITED

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

NEW ECONOMICS OF SOCIOLOGICAL CRIMINOLOGY (2002, background): “Using data on California inmates, Tremblay & Morselli (2000) find that involvement in the legal economy decreases with illegal earnings: 38% of all inmates always or mostly worked in the three years prior to their incarceration, whereas only 21% of those with high illegal incomes had been…”
Is It Who You Know, or How Many That Counts? Criminal Networks and Cost Avoidance in a Sample of Young Offenders (2010, background): “Specialization in crimes has been shown to be beneficial in criminal achievement, at least as it relates to criminal earnings (Hagan & McCarthy, 1997; McCarthy & Hagan, 2001; Tremblay & Morselli, 2000).”
Criminal Self-Efficacy (2012, methodology): “Fourth, an identical measure of criminal self-efficacy has been used successfully in previous criminological research (see Tremblay et al., 2007; Tremblay & Morselli, 2000).”
The Socioeconomic Determinants of Ill‐Gotten Gains: Within‐Person Changes in Drug Use and Illegal Earnings1 (2003, methodology): “Conversely, greater legal earnings and other income should reduce criminal earnings (Bourgois 1995; Levitt and Venkatesh 2001; McCarthy and Hagan 2001; Sullivan 1989; but see Tremblay and Morselli 2000).”