The language of evaluation

By Jeannett Martin, P. White. 2005

1,397 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92d1ee07030ac927da5d9ae8f93cea9614064e66

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Language and Linguistics

1. A. Ferguson
2. Ahmed Ali Abbasi
3. Arab Salem
4. Do Coyle
5. Elizabeth Armstrong
6. Hsinchun Chen

In Literature and Literary Theory

1. Ahmed Ali Abbasi
2. Arab Salem
3. Do Coyle
4. Hsinchun Chen

Citations in the corpus

• A pluriliteracies approach to content and language integrated learning – mapping learner progressions in knowledge construction and meaning-making (2015, background): “…question as to how subject-specific literacy learning can be promoted in school has been addressed by several scholars including Veel (1997), Martin and White (2005), Coffin (2006a, 2006b), Halliday and Matthiessen (2004), Martin and Rose (2008) and Llinares et al. (2012), drawing…”
• Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: Feature selection for opinion classification in Web forums (2008, methodology): “Developed based on appraisal theory [Martin and White 2005], each expression is manually classified into various appraisal classes.”
• Language, meaning, context, and functional communication (2010, background): “Evaluative meanings (Labov, 1972; Martin & White, 2005/2007) can be expressed through nouns (e.g., idiot, maniac), verbs (e.g., raced, enthused), adjectives (e.g., fantastic, horrible), intensifiers (e.g., very, clearly), or complete phrases or clauses (e.g., without a doubt).”