Towards more accurate and policy relevant footprint analyses: Tracing fine-scale socio-environmental impacts of production to consumption

By Javier Godar, U. M. Persson, E. Tizado, Patrick Meyfroidt. 2015

133 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Economics and Econometrics, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92c8349d2407d35955251272c4774e10e76f0940

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Richard Wood
2. S. Giljum
3. Tim Jackson
4. F. Krausmann

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Richard Wood
2. S. Giljum
3. D. Ivanova
4. Edgar G. Hertwich
5. Tim Jackson
6. Konstantin Stadler
7. Kjartan Steen‐Olsen
8. H. Schandl

In Environmental Engineering

1. S. Giljum
2. Richard Wood
3. F. Krausmann
4. N. Eisenmenger
5. H. Schandl
6. D. Ivanova
7. T. Wiedmann
8. Tim Jackson

Citations in the corpus

• Material Flow Accounting: Measuring Global Material Use for Sustainable Development (2017, background): “However, as some pilot studies illustrate (169, 170), environmental and social impacts of material use can vary significantly depending on the actual geographical location of the economic activity.”
• Mapping the carbon footprint of EU regions (2017, background): “Cross-country analyses conceal wide spatial heterogeneity within countries, which may potentially obstruct the effect of impact mitigation policies (Godar et al 2015, Chancel and Piketty 2015).”