WHICH AGGLOMERATION EXTERNALITIES MATTER MOST AND WHY
By Henri L. F. de Groot, Jacques Poot, M. Smit. 2016
185 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92ad6dd7dd8e4ba561aa10fe1ebc254be90e7e3d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- T. Huizen
- Andrea Caragliu
- J. Plantenga
- L. de Dominicis
- Henri L. F. de Groot
- M. Gopalan
- T. Stanley
- Robert Wilhelm Siegfried Ruhlandt
Citations in the corpus
- Do children benefit from universal early childhood education and care? A meta-analysis of evidence from natural experiments (2018, methodology): “Following several recent studies (e.g. Card et al., 2010; Groot et al., 2016), we classify the estimates by whether the effect of ECEC on children’s outcomes is significantly negative, statistically insignificant or significantly positive.”
- Both Marshall and Jacobs were Right! (2016, result): “24 Interesting to note – and consistent with the findings in this article – is that in an update of their earlier metaanalysis, De Groot et al. (2015) find evidence that specialization is more important in lower-density places and that more recent studies are less supportive of the importance of…”
- Related variety and economic development: a literature review (2016, unknown): “As reviewed by De Groot, Poot, and Smit (2016), the many empirical studies on MAR versus Jacobs, which followed on the seminal study by Glaeser et al. (1992), have provided very mixed results (Figure 1).1 There are almost as many studies that find evidence for the MAR hypothesis as there are…”