Microbial toxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles (CuO, NiO, ZnO, and Sb2O3) to Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Streptococcus aureus.

By Y. Baek, Y. An. Science of the Total Environment, 2011

656 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparative environmental fate and toxicity of copper nanomaterials (2017, background): “…toxicity across a range of toxicological endpoints at concentration< 1 mg/L (Griffitt et al., 2007; Griffitt et al., 2008; Heinlaan et al., 2008; Aruoja et al., 2009; García et al., 2011), while others only found toxicity at greater exposure concentrations (Blinova et al., 2010; Baek and An, 2011).”
Emerging patterns for engineered nanomaterials in the environment: a review of fate and toxicity studies (2014, background): “Sb2O3 caused toxicity only at concentrations greater than 140 mg L (Baek and An 2011).”
Treatment Strategies for Infected Wounds (2018, background): “aureus and Bacillus subtilis are less susceptible [150].”
Mechanism of photogenerated reactive oxygen species and correlation with the antibacterial properties of engineered metal-oxide nanoparticles. (2012, methodology): “In this study, we selected seven types of metal-oxide NPs (nTiO2, nCeO2, nZnO, nCuO, nSiO2, nAl2O3, and nFe2O3) as case studies because of their broad application in industrial products and their antibacterial properties.(8,10,25) 28 On these NPs we investigated the generation of three types of ROS ”