Bayesian learning in social networks

By Douglas Gale, Shachar Kariv. Games Econ. Behav., 2003

1,112 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Science and Operations Research, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9262868ce2e36409ad715b4d7179e0f591c27baf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

Citations in the corpus

Rational Social Learning by Random Sampling (2013, neutral): “model is very similar to that of Acemoglu, Dahleh, Lobel, and Ozdaglar (2008) (ADLO)”
Presidential Address: Social Transmission Bias in Economics and Finance (2020, neutral): “These include models of rational as well as biased social influence in networks3; the cultural transmission of ethnic, religious, and cooperative traits (Boyd and Richerson (1985), Bisin and 3 Rational: Banerjee (1992), Bikhchandani, Hirshleifer, and Welch (1992), and Acemoglu et al. (2011).”
Opinion dynamics in social networks with stubborn agents: Equilibrium and convergence rate (2014, neutral): “Key words: Multi-agent systems, Markov models, Equilibrium, Eigenvalues”
Information Heterogeneity and the Speed of Learning in Social Networks (2013, background): “Examples include, Gale and Kariv (2003), Rosenberg, Solan, and Vieille (2009), Acemoglu, Dahleh, Lobel, and Ozdaglar (2011), Lobel and Sadler (2012), Mueller-Frank (2013) and Acemoglu, Bimpikis, and Ozdaglar (forthcoming).”
Communication and influence (2015, methodology): “This relates to a recent literature on social learning in networks (see, for example, Bala and Goyal 1998 and Acemoglu et al. 2011) and we plan to pursue this analysis in future research.”
A Structural Model of Segregation in Social Networks (2010, background): “(2010); Nakajima (2007); Bandiera and Rasul (2006); Conley and Udry (forthcoming); Golub and Jackson (2011); Acemoglu et al. (2011). (2)See Currarini et al. (2009, 2010), De Marti and Zenou (2009),Echenique et al. (2006). (3)Jackson and Wolinsky (1996), Bala and Goyal (2000), Galeotti (2006), Jackso”
Binary Opinion Dynamics with Stubborn Agents (2013, background): “, [Acemoglu et al. 2010b; Banerjee 1992; Jackson 2008]).”
Trading and Information Diffusion in Over-the-Counter Markets (2012, background): “5 A separate literature studies Bayesian (Acemoglu et al. (2011)) and non-Bayesian (Bala and Goyal (1998), DeMarzo, Vayanos and Zwiebel (2003), Golub and Jackson (2010)) learning in the context of arbitrary connected social networks.”
Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. (2006, background): “Research on social learning (e.g., Anderson & Holt 1997; Banerjee 2002; Bikhchandani et al. 1992; Gale & Kariv 2003; Young 1993; 1998) treats the important role of information transfer in the learning process.”
Opinion Dynamics and Learning in Social Networks (2011, methodology): “We now outline the model and the results from [5].”
Naïve Learning in Social Networks and the Wisdom of Crowds (2010, background): “The agents of Acemoglu et al. (2008) take one action as opposed to updating constantly, and the learning there is observational.”