Enhancing the Pace of Recovery Self-Distanced Analysis of Negative Experiences Reduces

By O. Ayduk. 2008

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Self-Distancing: Theory, Research, and Current Directions (2017, background): “…that people who repress their emotions (i.e., a sign of avoidance coping) display high scores on implicit measures of emotionality but low scores on self-report measures. of their feelings (also see, Ayduk & Kross, 2009; Kross & Ayduk, 2008; Kross, Duckworth, et al., 2011; Kross et al., 2012).”
Analyzing Negative Experiences Without Ruminating: The Role of Self-Distancing in Enabling Adaptive Self-Reflection (2010, methodology): “As a first step toward addressing this question, we (Kross & Ayduk, 2009) pooled data from five published studies (Ayduk & Kross, 2008; Kross et al., 2005; Studies 1 & 2; Kross & Ayduk, 2008; Studies 1 & 2), which also included unanalyzed Beck Depression Inventory (BDI; Beck, Ward, Mendelson, Mock,…”
Dealing with feeling: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. (2012, background): “Studies suggest that focusing on feelings heightens emotion and is thus maladaptive (e.g., Ayduk & Kross, 2008; Kross et al., 2005; Morrow & Nolen-Hoeksema, 1990; Nolen-Hoeksema, 1991; reviews by Mor & Winquist, 2002; Nolen-Hoeksema, 2000).”