Contract farming configuration: Smallholders’ preferences for contract design attributes

By G. Abebe, J. Bijman, Ron G. M. Kemp, Onno S. W. F. Omta, A. Tsegaye. 2013

228 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Business and International Management, Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91e38970e706be9aeeb5309fb645ea9d1e06581e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Business and International Management

1. Doreen Kufoalor
2. I. Lambrecht
3. C. Ragasa

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Doreen Kufoalor
2. Julian Sagebiel
3. Jakob R. Müller
4. I. Lambrecht
5. C. Ragasa
6. Jens Rommel

In General Agricultural and Biological Sciences

1. Doreen Kufoalor
2. I. Lambrecht
3. C. Ragasa

Citations in the corpus

• Are consumers willing to pay more for electricity from cooperatives? Results from an online Choice Experiment in Germany (2014, background): “Abebe et al. (2013) study preferences for different contract farming settings of smallholders in Ethopia.”
• Limitations of Contract Farming as a Pro-poor Strategy: The Case of Maize Outgrower Schemes in Upper West Ghana (2018, result): “Available studies show mixed results (Barrett et al. 2012; Abebe et al. 2013; Bellemare 2012; Miyata and Minot 2009; Wang et al. 2014; Reardon et al. 2009; Simmons, Winters, and Patrick 2005; Singh 2002; Warning and Key 2002; Oya 2012), and there is ongoing debate about CFAs’ role in rural economic…”