Comparison of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone diets for weight loss and heart disease risk reduction: a randomized trial.
By M. Dansinger, J. Gleason, J. Griffith, H. Selker, E. Schaefer. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2005
1,742 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91dcb4ca26f12b165d67b6e028c078b55a59ec98
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Physiology
In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Citations in the corpus
- ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patients. (2017, neutral): “carbohydrate-rich or fatrich) is low [160,161].”
- Effects of low-carbohydrate vs low-fat diets on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (2006, neutral): “4 (8) Samaha et al,20 2003/ Stern et al,21 2004 6 130 (23) 132 (27) −5.”
- The Science of Obesity Management: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement. (2018, neutral): “Low fat (,30% fat) 22.6 kgb Dansinger et al., 2005 (216) 160, 51% F, 58% completed 4 Atkins (Low Carb) 22.1 kga 12 All patients had hypertension, dyslipidemia, and/or fasting hyperglycemia.”