Low-tech coral reef restoration methods modeled after natural fragmentation processes
By A. Bowden-Kerby. 2001
127 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91b9450104d71a10bf584a1cd6dfa77df56a72d9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- S. Schopmeyer
- Chelsey N. Young
- J. Barton
- D. Lirman
- E. Bartels
- David S. Gilliam
- K. Hutson
- E. Goergen
Citations in the corpus
- Regional restoration benchmarks for Acropora cervicornis (2017, background): “Adapted from terrestrial silviculture, ‘‘coral gardening’’ is one of the most commonly used coral propagation and restoration methods (Rinkevich 1995; Bowden-Kerby 2001; Epstein et al. 2003; Shafir et al. 2006; Shafir and Rinkevich 2008; Shaish et al. 2008).”
- A Review of Reef Restoration and Coral Propagation Using the Threatened Genus Acropora in the Caribbean and Western Atlantic (2012, methodology): “Thus, the integration of socioeconomic needs and perspectives of local stakeholder groups who depend upon coral reefs in the Caribbean is an important step in successful coral reef restoration (Bowden-Kerby 2001, Goreau and Hilbertz 2005).”
- Coral propagation: a review of techniques for ornamental trade and reef restoration (2017, background): “Some authors recommend collection of larger fragments to minimise fragment mortality (Bowden-Kerby 1997, 2001; Okubo et al. 2005; Forsman et al. 2006).”
- Propagation of the threatened staghorn coral Acropora cervicornis: methods to minimize the impacts of fragment collection and maximize production (2010, background): “From a fragment-survivorship perspective, it is clearly better to collect larger fragments to minimize fragment mortality (Bowden-Kerby 1997, 2001; Raymundo and Maypa 2004; Okubo et al. 2005; Forsman et al. 2006).”