Regional restoration benchmarks for Acropora cervicornis
By S. Schopmeyer, D. Lirman, E. Bartels, David S. Gilliam, E. Goergen, S. Griffin, Meaghan E. Johnson, C. Lustic, K. Maxwell, Cory S. Walter. Coral reefs, 2017
105 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85d39fe4643aa384e93c7ea4abe951b9f643ac05
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- M. Omori
- David John Suggett
- D. Ceccarelli
- R. Babcock
- P. Harrison
- E. Bayraktarov
- S. Ferse
- Trevor J. Willis
In Global and Planetary Change
- M. Omori
- David John Suggett
- D. Ceccarelli
- R. Babcock
- P. Harrison
- Trevor J. Willis
- Dominique Pelletier
- Euan Harvey
In Oceanography
- M. Omori
- David John Suggett
- D. Ceccarelli
- R. Babcock
- P. Harrison
- E. Bayraktarov
- R. Geider
- Hugh L. MacIntyre
Citations in the corpus
- Coral restoration research and technical developments: what we have learned so far (2019, background): “For restoration of Acropora cervicornis, Schopmeyer et al. (2017) propose the benchmarks for the first year of activities: >80% survivorship of nursery corals and >70% of outplanted corals.”
- Coral restoration – A systematic review of current methods, successes, failures and future directions (2020, background): “>0% live tissue remaining = live [61,62,97,136,137]).”