Direct-use values of woodland resources consumed and traded in a South African village

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa (2007, unknown): “Fewer studies deal with use of all resources at a project site (e.g. Dovie et al., 2002, Shackleton et al., 2002a, Shackleton et al., 2002b and Cocks and Wiersum, 2003).”
The impact of commercial harvesting on Warburgia salutaris (‘pepper-bark tree’) in Mpumalanga, South Africa (2004, background): “…of wild plants often exacerbates the difficulty in managing harvested populations sustainably, particularly when demand is high, and harvesters lack tenure or strong usufruct rights and/or customary rules of uses have been eroded (Godoy and Bawa 1993; Dovie et al. 2002; Luoga et al. 2004a).”
Consumption and direct-use values of savanna bio-resources used by rural households in Mametja, a semi-arid area of Limpopo province, South Africa. (2003, unknown): “…This study Mabins A 6191 22.01 12.11 This study The Willows 8031 11.91 8.11 Banks et al. (1996)25 Athol 5002 – – Banks et al. (1996)25 Welverdiend 5552 – – Dovie et al. (2002)16 Thorndale 692 3.13 25.0 Shackleton et al. (1999)14 Ha-Gondo 1038 21.4 4.1 Shackleton et al. (1999)14 Mogano 1173 25.1…”