F. Paumgarten

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences · 2005–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 13 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• General Agricultural and Biological Sciences — 22 citations into it
• Global and Planetary Change — 22 citations into it; #2,576 of 10,225 by trust here, #5,517 by citations
• Soil Science — 14 citations into it; #662 of 2,166 by trust here, #1,387 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 10 citations into it
• Economics and Econometrics — 6 citations into it; #23,227 of 23,481 by trust here, #20,730 by citations
• Safety Research — 6 citations into it
• Business and International Management — 5 citations into it

Whom F. Paumgarten trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. C. Shackleton
2. Emmanuel Skoufias
3. Sven Wunder
4. S. Shackleton
5. K. McSweeney
6. M. Fisher
7. S. Scherr
8. G. Wood
9. B. Sen
10. A. Angelsen

Who trusts F. Paumgarten overall

1. C. Shackleton
2. N. Hogarth
3. S. Shackleton
4. M. Pouliot
5. Felix Kanungwe Kalaba
6. B. Belcher
7. A. Angelsen
8. Mallika Sardeshpande

Papers from F. Paumgarten's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers F. Paumgarten trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Poverty Alleviation and Tropical Forests—What Scope for Synergies?
2. Empirical regularities in the poverty-environment relationship of rural households: evidence from Zimbabwe.
3. Exploring the forest–poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications
4. Forest Product Sale as Natural Insurance: The Effects of Household Characteristics and the Nature of Shock in Eastern Honduras
5. The importance of non-timber forest products in rural livelihood security and as safety nets: a review of evidence from South Africa
6. Wealth differentiation in household use and trade in non-timber forest products in South Africa
7. Staying Secure, Staying Poor: The “Faustian Bargain”
8. A downward spiral? Research evidence on the relationship between poverty and natural resource degradation.
9. The Role of non-timber forest products as safety-nets: A review of evidence with a focus on South Africa
10. Household welfare and forest dependence in Southern Malawi (Environment and Development Economics)

Their papers

• The role of non-timber forest products in household coping strategies in South Africa: the influence of household wealth and gender (2011) — 119 citations
• Opportunities for Enhancing Poor Women's Socioeconomic Empowerment in the Value Chains of Three African Non-Timber Forest Products (NTFPs) (2011) — 192 citations
• Wealth differentiation in household use and trade in non-timber forest products in South Africa (2009) — 121 citations
• The Role of non-timber forest products as safety-nets: A review of evidence with a focus on South Africa (2005) — 145 citations