US Environmental Regulation and FDI: Evidence from a Panel of US-Based Multinational Firms

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Regulation-Induced Pollution Substitution (2019, background): “This study also contributes to the literature on pollution leakage (Levinson & Taylor, 2008; Fowlie, 2009; Hanna, 2010; Bushnell & Mansur, 2011) by presenting evidence of unintended emissions leakage across existing domestic plants.”
The Transitional Costs of Sectoral Reallocation: Evidence From the Clean Air Act and the Workforce* (2013, unknown): “Obviously, there are many more economic costs associated with the regulations, notably plant productivity effects (Greenstone, List, and Syverson 2010), losses to foreign direct investment (Hanna 2010), as well as”
Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South Korea (2014, unknown): “Secondly, even though the pollution haven hypothesis is testable by examining the pattern of FDI flow (Cole and Elliott, 2005; Eskeland and Harrison, 2003; Hanna, 2010; Javorcik and Wei, 2004; Kellenberg, 2009), trade flow (Broner et al.”
The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Competitiveness (2017, methodology): “(24)The use of disaggregated data allows Hanna (2010) to avoid reverse causality issues, control for unobserved heterogeneity at the firm level, and industry trends, thus going a long way toward avoiding the problem of omitted variable bias.”