The social consequences of transport decision-making: clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications
297 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/914700c68d10b622a2aabfb582d4fe20a4fc17e1
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
In Transportation
- Ahmed El-Geneidy
- Bert van Wee
- D. Oviedo
- Luis Angel Guzman
- K. Maat
- C. Mahony Reátegui Rivera
- Floridea di Ciommo
- Yoram Shiftan
Citations in the corpus
- Transport equity analysis (2017, background): “This Special Issue aims to bring equity evaluation in urban transport from the fringe to the core and to contribute to equity in transport planning debate (Jones & Lucas, 2012).”
- Assessing equity in transport accessibility to work and study: The Bogotá region (2017, background): “Growing concern about the social consequences of mobility has led to a visible increase in research exploring the links between transport, poverty, welfare and sustainability (Hine, 2009;Jones and Lucas, 2012).”
- The Cost of Equity: Assessing Transit Accessibility and Social Disparity Using Total Travel Cost (2016, background): “Access to opportunities such as jobs and services is one of the main benefits of a transportation service such as public transit (Grengs, 2010; Jones & Lucas, 2012).”
- A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches (2016, background): “A particular criticism of CBA of relevance to this paper is that it tends not to address the equity effects and other ethically important implications of policy options, e.g. in the area of social exclusion (Jones and Lucas 2012).”