The transition from population III to population II-I star formation

By Umberto De Maio, Benedetta Ciardi, Klaus Dolag, Luca Tornatore, S. Khochfar. 2010

150 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present results from the first cosmological simulations which study the onset of primordial, metal-free (population III), cosmic star formation and the transition to the present-day, metalrich star formation (population II-I), including molecular (H2, HD, etc.) evolution, tracing the injection of metals by supernovae (SNe) into the surrounding intergalactic medium and following the change in the initial mass function (IMF) according to the metallicity of the corresponding stellar population. Our investigation addresses the role of a wide variety of parameters (critical metallicity for the transition, IMF slope and range, SN/pair-instability SN metal yields, star formation threshold, resolution, etc.) on the metal-enrichment history and the associated transition in the star formation mode. All simulations present common trends. Metal enrichment is very patchy, with rare, unpolluted regions surviving at all redshifts, inducing the simultaneous presence of metal-free and metal-rich star formation regimes. As a result of the rapid pollution within high-density regions due to the first SN/pair-instability SN, local metallicity is quickly boosted above the critical metallicity for the transition. For this reason, population III stars dominate only during the very first stages of structure formation, with an average contribution to the total star formation rate that reaches a constant value of ∼10 −3 at redshift ∼11–13. If primordial supenovae consisted only of type II ones, the contribution would be ∼10 −1 . Interestingly, the above conclusions are independent from many poorly constrained

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/913527f1af2ac220c62d70123228713f827bc189

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Richard S. Ellis
  2. J. Dunlop
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. P. Hopkins
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. S. Khochfar
  7. Volker Springel
  8. John H. Wise

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. John H. Wise
  2. M. Norman
  3. J. Hjorth
  4. M. Livio
  5. Richard S. Ellis
  6. J. Dunlop
  7. P. Dayal
  8. Tom Abel

Citations in the corpus