The UV continua and inferred stellar populations of galaxies at z ~7-9 revealed by the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field 2012 campaign

By J. Dunlop, A. B. Rogers, Ross J. McLure, Richard S. Ellis, B. Robertson, A. Koekemoer, P. Dayal, E. Curtis-Lake, V. Wild, S. Charlot and 9 more. 2012

148 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use the new ultra-deep, near-infrared imaging of the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field (HUDF) provided by our UDF12 Hubble Space Telescope (HST) Wide Field Camera 3/IR campaign to explore the rest-frame ultraviolet (UV) properties of galaxies at redshifts z > 6.5. We present the first unbiased measurement of the average UV power-law index, 〈β〉, (fλ ∝ λ^β) for faint galaxies at z ≃ 7, the first meaningful measurements of 〈β〉 at z ≃ 8, and tentative estimates for a new sample of galaxies at z ≃ 9. Utilizing galaxy selection in the new F140W (J_140) imaging to minimize colour bias, and applying both colour and power-law estimators of β, we find 〈β〉 = −2.1 ± 0.2 at z ≃ 7 for galaxies with M_UV ≃ −18. This means that the faintest galaxies uncovered at this epoch have, on average, UV colours no more extreme than those displayed by the bluest star-forming galaxies at low redshift. At z ≃ 8 we find a similar value, 〈β〉 = −1.9 ± 0.3. At z ≃ 9, we find 〈β〉 = −1.8 ± 0.6, essentially unchanged from z ≃ 6 to 7 (albeit highly uncertain). Finally, we show that there is as yet no evidence for a significant intrinsic scatter in β within our new, robust z ≃ 7 galaxy sample. Our results are most easily explained by a population of steadily star-forming galaxies with either ≃ solar metallicity and zero dust, or moderately sub-solar (≃10–20 per cent) metallicity with modest dust obscuration (AV ≃ 0.1–0.2). This latter interpretation is consistent with the predictions of a state-of-the-art galaxy-formation simulation, which also suggests that a significant population of very-low metallicity, dust-free galaxies with β ≃ −2.5 may not emerge until M_UV > −16, a regime likely to remain inaccessible until the James Webb Space Telescope.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a786a36cdd8c3856d5e713520198248ec613df0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. P. V. van Dokkum
  4. Richard S. Ellis
  5. M. Franx
  6. R. Somerville
  7. R. Dav'e
  8. J. Dunlop

In Instrumentation

  1. P. V. van Dokkum
  2. Richard S. Ellis
  3. M. Franx
  4. R. Bouwens
  5. J. Dunlop
  6. I. Labbé
  7. C. Conroy
  8. P. Oesch

Citations in the corpus