Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation

By John Rolfe, Jeffrey Bennett, Jordan J. Louviere. 2000

310 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/911508380481514e02a9fea7a9a917cc4ca260a9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. E. Birol
2. G. Herath
3. Jayanath Ananda
4. Jordan J. Louviere
5. Phoebe Koundouri
6. Y. Kountouris
7. Jeffrey Bennett
8. John Rolfe

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Jordan J. Louviere
2. E. Birol
3. G. Herath
4. Jayanath Ananda
5. Phoebe Koundouri
6. Y. Kountouris
7. Jeffrey Bennett
8. John Rolfe

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. G. Herath
2. Jayanath Ananda
3. E. Birol
4. Jordan J. Louviere
5. Phoebe Koundouri
6. Y. Kountouris
7. Jeffrey Bennett
8. John Rolfe

Citations in the corpus

• Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study (2007, unknown): “[57] 7 2þ sq 16 — MNL 105 (EE) ð84Þ Carlsson and Martinsson [17] 3 2 14 D-optimal EVHL 350 (JEEM) ð3Þ Zwerina et al.”
• A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning (2009, methodology): “Bennet et al. (2000) presented a framework to analyse value preferences of forestry products and services using choice modelling, a variant of conjoint analysis.”
• Using a choice experiment to account for preference heterogeneity in wetland attributes: The case of Cheimaditida wetland in Greece (2006, background): “avoiding IIA violations, since these are relevant to preferences of the respondents and can increase the deterministic component of utility while decreasing the error one (Rolfe et al., 2000; Bateman et al., 2003).”
• Cultural bequest values for ecosystem service flows among indigenous fishers: A discrete choice experiment validated with mixed methods (2015, unknown): “Due to their flexibility, DCEs are perhaps themost appropriate available method for eliciting values in complex situations involving tradeoffs between multiple ecosystem services, particularly those linked to socio-cultural values (Adamowicz et al., 2008; Noonan, 2003; Rolfe et al., 2000).”
• Assessing the economic viability of alternative water resources in water-scarce regions: Combining economic valuation, cost-benefit analysis and discounting (2010, methodology): “To improve model fit and estimate more accurate models of choice, CLMs with interactions are estimated for both CEs, using farmer and household-level characteristics that are expected to affect the respondents’ choices of aquifer management plan (Rolfe et al. 2000).”
• Using a Choice Experiment to Estimate Farmers’ Valuation of Agrobiodiversity on Hungarian Small Farms (2006, background): “This is also a common solution to problems arising from violations of the IIA (e.g., Rolfe et al. 2000 ).”
• A Choice Modeling Application for Greek Heritage Attractions (2005, background): “The systematic heterogeneous specification of discrete choice modeling captures differences in utility through the interaction of socioeconomic and/ or situational characteristics with product attributes (Blamey, Gordon, and Chapman 1999; Rolfe, Bennett, and Louviere 2000).”
• Stated Values and Reminders of Substitute Goods: Testing for Framing Effects with Choice Modelling (2002, methodology): “The lack of violations for 5Examples of part-worths and value di erences between pro®les are given in Rolfe et al. (2000).”
• Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: Charisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects (2012, unknown): “In most cases these studies have focused on charismatic species, for example, the Black Rhino or African elephant, or on specific biodiversity-rich ecosystems, such as, rainforests (Horton et al., 2003; Kramer and Mercer, 1997; Rolfe et al., 2000; Svedsater, 2000; Swanson and Kontoleon, 2003).”
• Multi-attributed environmental index construction (2006, background): “Human values associated with water resources are often classified as use and non-use values (Robin, 1998; Turner et al., 2003; Rolfe et al., 2000; Ferrara and Missios, 1998).”
• Discrete Choice Models and Valuation Experiments (2003, unknown): “The consistency of CL forms with respect to IIA is quite a rare outcome in the choice experiment literature (Foster and Mourato, 2000; Hanley et al., 1998; Rolfe et al., 2000).”