Profitability Goals, Control Goals, and the R&D Investment Decisions of Family and Nonfamily Firms

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Innovation in Family Firms: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research (2018, background): “Kotlar et al. (2014) Family Involvement in Firm Management and Governance R&D Investments FFs’ relevance of both profitability and control goals is determined by a sequential logic.”
Innovation Through Tradition: Lessons From Innovative Family Businesses and Directions for Future Research (2016, background): “However, family businesses may display extremely diverse innovation behaviors and outcomes (Chrisman & Patel, 2012; De Massis et al., in press; Kotlar et al., 2014).”
The impact of small- and medium-sized family firms on economic growth (2015, background): “…of discontinuous technologies than nonfamily firms (König et al. 2013); indeed, research has found that when performance is below aspirations, family firms increase their R&D investments more than non-family firms (Chrisman and Patel 2012; Gómez-Mejı́a et al. 2011; Kotlar et al. 2014).”
Family Business Growth Around the World (2020, background): “And still others require a substantial ownership stake as well as managerial presence (Chrisman & Patel, 2012; Chua et al., 1999; Kotlar et al., 2014, 2018).”
Technological Innovation Inputs, Outputs, and Performance (2016, methodology): “Particularly, we followed the definition of Kotlar et al. (2014), who considered both family ownership and family involvement in top management to build a binary measurement of family-managed firms.”