Practical Conservation Biology
By David B. Lindenmayer, Mark A. Burgman. 2005
131 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90f508a086ae68c3d7c5477394c8cfeed60b6169
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
Citations in the corpus
- The science and application of ecological monitoring (2010, methodology): “Examples include the difficulties of combining sub-indices for habitat attributes in constructing Habitat Suitability Index models (reviewed by Lindenmayer and Burgman (2005) and Van Horne and Wiens (1991)) and combining landscape indices into meaningful measures of landscape cover (Cale and Hobbs,…”
- Range-wide analysis of wildlife habitat: Implications for conservation (2010, background): “The AUC ranges from 0 to 1, where a score of 1 indicates perfect discrimination, a score of 0.5 implies a prediction that is not better than random, and lower than 0.5 implies a worse than random prediction.”
- How to make a common species rare: A case against conservation complacency (2011, background): “This is critically important: many studies have demonstrated that significant decline and/or extinction is frequently the result of multiple threatening processes (Caughley and Gunn, 1996; Lindenmayer and Burgman, 2005; Simberloff, 1988).”
- Current threats faced by Neotropical parrot populations (2017, background): “…as the unit for conservation may help identify and reverse conservation problems while species are still common and ensures that genetic variation is preserved (Lindenmayer and Burgman, 2005), and 3) the population-level conservation approach is less affected by changes in organismic taxonomy.”