A primal–dual active set strategy for non-linear multibody contact problems
By Stefan Hüeber, Barbara I. Wohlmuth. 2005
284 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Control and Systems Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90d6ed559da8d921e6c757a8fe5e82093de31254
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
- Ilker Temizer
- M. Gitterle
- Axel Gerstenberger
- Thomas J. R. Hughes
- Rolf H. Krause
- Michael W. Gee
- Wolfgang A. Wall
- Thomas Dickopf
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Laura De Lorenzis
- Wolfgang A. Wall
- Alexander Popp
- Peter Wriggers
- Giorgio Zavarise
- Thomas J. R. Hughes
- Ilker Temizer
- Christian Hesch
In Control and Systems Engineering
- Alexander Popp
- Wolfgang A. Wall
- Laura De Lorenzis
- Christian Hesch
- Giorgio Zavarise
- Peter Wriggers
- Thomas J. R. Hughes
- Ilker Temizer
Citations in the corpus
- A mortar formulation for 3D large deformation contact using NURBS-based isogeometric analysis and the augmented Lagrangian method (2012, methodology): “A further improvement has been more recently introduced with the advent of the mortar methods [16–18,32,33,39], which simultaneously satisfy patch test and LBB stability requirements, albeit at a higher computational cost.”
- A dual mortar approach for 3D finite deformation contact with consistent linearization (2010, methodology): “Other applications can be found in [18, 19, 31].”
- A finite deformation mortar contact formulation using a primal–dual active set strategy (2009, unknown): “Following an approach given in [22, 24] we define a so-called complementarity function C j for each slave node j ∈S as C j (z j ,d)=(zn) j −max(0, (zn) j −cng̃ j ), cn>0 (56) This is a nonlinear function of the displacements as both the nodal normal n j in (zn) j =n j ·z j and the nodal weighted gap”
- Three-dimensional mortar-based frictional contact treatment in isogeometric analysis with NURBS (2012, background): “an exact evaluation of the surface integrals contributing to the weak formulation, combined with a discrete satisfaction of the continuous contact constraints through projected quantities [54,22,49,25,13,50,48,21,26,59].”
- Efficient simulation of multi‐body contact problems on complex geometries: A flexible decomposition approach using constrained minimization (2009, methodology): “As solution algorithm for the nonlinear multi-body contact problem discretized by mortar finite elements we apply”
- Unilateral non‐linear dynamic contact of thin‐walled structures using a primal‐dual active set strategy (2007, unknown): “This approach has been successfully applied to geometrically linear multibody [15] and to materially non-linear [24] contact problems.”
- A large deformation frictional contact formulation using NURBS‐based isogeometric analysis (2011, methodology): “The second algorithm is based on the mortar method [15, 23–28].”