Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: implications and applications for conservation

By H. Slabbekoorn, Erwin A. P. Ripmeester. Molecular Ecology, 2008

633 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90c5f98852e149634c5955fa5e4b898b0024da1e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

1. Paola Laiolo
2. H. Slabbekoorn
3. Andrew Sih
4. C. P. Ortega
5. Yang Hu
6. G. C. Cardoso
7. W. Halfwerk
8. C. D. Francis

In Ecology

1. Andrew Sih
2. Paola Laiolo
3. H. Slabbekoorn
4. C. P. Ortega
5. Yang Hu
6. G. C. Cardoso
7. C. D. Francis
8. W. Halfwerk

Citations in the corpus

• Which birds adjust the frequency of vocalizations in urban noise (2010, background): “Raising the minimum frequency of songs has been documented in various urban songbird species (reviewed in Slabbekoorn & Ripmeester 2008).”
• The emerging significance of bioacoustics in animal species conservation (2010, background): “…of animal species, what are the stochastic or deterministic mechanisms involved (natural, sexual or social selection processes), and what information of conservation significance can be derived by studying animal sounds (Rabin and Greene 2002, Slabbekoorn & Ripmeester 2008, Laiolo et al. 2008).”