Which birds adjust the frequency of vocalizations in urban noise
By Yang Hu, G. C. Cardoso. 2010
166 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental Biology, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cff82b36d6fb0b257bb3b0c1649fcae4ff1163d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental Biology
- A. Radford
- J. Barber
- Peter P. Marra
- Gareth J. F. Jones
- J. Read
- Jenélle Dowling
- David A. Luther
- C. D. Francis
In Ecology
- A. Radford
- J. Barber
- Peter P. Marra
- Gareth J. F. Jones
- J. Read
- Jenélle Dowling
- David A. Luther
- C. D. Francis
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Peter P. Marra
- Gareth J. F. Jones
- J. Read
- Jenélle Dowling
- David A. Luther
- A. Radford
- D. Russo
- Matthew D. Johnson
Citations in the corpus
- Comparative effects of urban development and anthropogenic noise on bird songs (2012, result): “Our study is also one of the very few urban song studies that include more than one bird species (but see Hu and Cardoso 2009, 2010).”
- Fitness costs as well as benefits are important when considering responses to anthropogenic noise (2014, background): “For instance, there is a positive relationship between the existing vocal frequency range of a species and its response to noise (Hu and Cardoso 2010; Francis et al.”
- A Framework for Understanding Noise Impacts on Wildlife: An Urgent Conservation Priority (2013, background): “Finally, although the list of species known to shift their signals in response to noise is growing, there is at least one frog species and some bird species that do not alter their vocalizations in response to noise (eg Hu and Cardoso 2010; Love and Bee 2010; Francis et al. 2011b).”