Stabilization and Savings Funds for Nonrenewable Resources: Experience and Fiscal Policy Implications

By Jeffrey M. Davis, R. Ossowski, J. Daniel. 2001

249 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90aca48ddffb870e75f9da5a8161ca516957320f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Public Investment in Resource-Abundant Developing Countries (2012, background): “The conventional advice, which is based on the permanent income hypothesis, prescribes that off-the-ground resource wealth should be saved externally in a sovereign wealth fund (e.g., Davis et al. (2001), Barnett and Ossowski (2003), and Bems and de Carvalho Filho (2011)).”
Resource curse: An analysis of causes, experiences and possible ways forward (2007, background): “The Norwegian government accumulates assets into the GPF from general government budget surpluses (Hannesson, 2001; Skancke, 2003; Davis et al., 2003).”
Absorbing a Windfall of Foreign Exchange: Dutch Disease Dynamics (2013, methodology): “This suggests that use of the permanent income hypothesis as a basis for policy, as suggested in studies of the International Monetary Fund (e.g., Davis et al., 2002), needs modification in the light of absorption issues.”
Real Exchange Rate and International Reserves in an Era of Growing Financial and Trade Integration (2007, unknown): “Consequently, countries exposed to TOT volatility may benefit from active management of international reserves in ways that go well beyond the conventional prerogative of a central bank (see Davis et al., 2001, for a review of the experience of Chile and Norway).”
Monetary Policy in Emerging Markets (2010, unknown): “95 Davis et al (2001).”
Combating the Resource Curse: An Alternative Solution to Managing Mineral Wealth (2006, unknown): “76 Davis et al. 2003.”