How are foresight methods selected

By R. Popper. 2008

406 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Environmental Chemistry, Management Science and Operations Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9095efbfd8705ec6a6e9661266d299cf883ade23

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. S. Gössling
2. C. Michael Hall
3. René Rohrbeck

In Environmental Chemistry

1. S. Gössling
2. C. Michael Hall

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Cinzia Battistella
2. Eelko K. R. E. Huizingh
3. S. Gössling
4. C. Michael Hall
5. René Rohrbeck
6. Menes Etingue Kum
7. Wpm Wim Vanhaverbeke
8. Sabine Brunswicker

Citations in the corpus

• Corporate foresight: An emerging field with a rich tradition (2015, background): “The shared past of research on strategic foresight for policy making and for organizations has been effective in creating a strong platform with an extensive portfolio of methods and processual bestpractices (Miles et al., 2009; Voros, 2003; Popper, 2008).”
• Sharing versus collaborative economy: how to align ICT developments and the SDGs in tourism? (2019, background): “As highlighted by Popper (2008), there exist a wide range of foresight methods, which are usually selected on the basis of intuition, insight or impulsiveness.”