A comparative review of camera calibrating methods with accuracy evaluation

584 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Fringe projection techniques: Whither we are? (2010, methodology): “standard camera calibration techniques of the computer vision field [150, 151, 152].”
Digital camera calibration methods: Considerations and comparisons (2006, unknown): “…& Förstner, 2004; Cronk et al., 2006), stability of parameters (Shortis & Beyer, 1997; Peipe & Stephani, 2003; Läbe & Förstner, 2004), behaviour of IO parameters (Wiley & Wong, 1995; Läbe & Förstner, 2004) and accuracy aspects (D’Apuzzo & Maas, 1999; Salvi et al., 2002; Fraser & Al-Ajlouni, 2006).”
Robot Guidance Using Machine Vision Techniques in Industrial Environments: A Comparative Review (2016, background): “Given a point in the scene, its corresponding point in the image can be obtained by mathematical models [21].”
Camera as the instrument: the rising trend of vision based measurement (2014, background): “A variety of techniques are already available for camera calibration [28] and more are being proposed in recent research [29].”