A neighborhood view of interactions among individual plants
165 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9022604b8b1d5edeb998a67c25e6ce054dd5b81a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
- F. Pugnaire
- Fernando T. Maestre
- C. Armas
- L. Cavieres
- Fabien Anthelme
- Rasmus Astrup
- R. Callaway
- Volker Grimm
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- F. Pugnaire
- Fernando T. Maestre
- R. Callaway
- Richard Michalet
- L. Cavieres
- C. Armas
- P. Liancourt
- Rob W. Brooker
In Plant Science
- F. Pugnaire
- R. Callaway
- Fernando T. Maestre
- L. Cavieres
- Richard Michalet
- C. Armas
- Rob W. Brooker
- P. Liancourt
Citations in the corpus
- Effect of narrow-row planting patterns on crop competitive and economic advantage in maize–soybean relay strip intercropping system (2017, background): “The individuals interact with their neighbors over restricted distances because of the immobility of plants in intercropping (Stoll & Weiner, 2000).”
- Estimating mean plant cover from different types of cover data: a coherent statistical framework (2014, background): “Many plant species have been shown to have an aggregated spatial pattern due to e.g., the size of the plant, clonal growth, and limited seed dispersal (Pacala and Levin 1997, Herben et al. 2000, Stoll and Weiner 2000, Chen et al. 2006, 2008).”
- Current knowledge and future research opportunities for modeling annual crop mixtures. A review (2019, unknown): “In a given environment, their relative importance varies according to the type of annual crop mixture, because spatio-temporal arrangement determines the immediate neighborhood of a target plant (Stoll and Weiner 2000; Table 1).”
- Competition among plants: Concepts, individual-based modelling approaches, and a proposal for a future research strategy (2008, background): “Asymmetric competition means that larger individuals have a disproportionate advantage over smaller individuals leading to a growth depression of the latter (Weiner, 1990; Stoll and Weiner, 2000).”
- Competition and tree crowns: a neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species. (2010, methodology): “…study we characterise tree crown structure using neighborhood analysis, an approach that assumes plant communities can be understood as a collection of individuals interacting in a spatial manner over restricted distances (Stoll and Weiner, 2000; Gratzer et al., 2004; Canham and Uriarte, 2006).”
- Evidence of species-specific neighborhood effects in the dipterocarpaceae of a Bornean rain forest (2005, background): “The neighborhood view of plant interactions has received much attention in population ecology of single species (Stoll and Weiner 2000).”
- Facilitation in plant communities: the past, the present, and the future (2007, background): “…include the key elements of neighbourhood models (currently used to examine competitive plant interactions), i.e. individuals with an explicit location and basal extension where no other plant can exist, and a zone of competitive influence in which negative interactions occur (Stoll & Weiner 2000).”