Evidence of species-specific neighborhood effects in the dipterocarpaceae of a Bornean rain forest

By P. Stoll, D. M. Newbery. 2005

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Testing predictions of the Janzen–Connell hypothesis: a meta-analysis of experimental evidence for distance- and density-dependent seed and seedling survival (2014, background): “Observational studies have reported negative density-dependent recruitment, growth and survival for saplings and adult plants (Peters 2003; Uriarte et al. 2004; Stoll & Newbery 2005; Steinitz et al. 2011; Piao et al. 2013).”
Species associations in an old‐growth temperate forest in north‐eastern China (2010, unknown): “Several other studies using individual-based analyses of local neighbourhood effects on tree growth and survival confirmed this result (e.g. Uriarte et al. 2004, 2005; Stoll & Newbery 2005) suggesting that direct plant–plant interactions in forests may fade away at larger scales.”
Individual-tree radial growth in a subtropical broad-leaved forest: The role of local neighbourhood competition (2011, unknown): “For each species, the performance of different competition ndices and neighbour inclusion approaches to quantify the effects f competition on radial growth was tested using least squares linar regression analyses (Stoll and Newbery, 2005; Vanclay, 2006).”
Functional role of forest diversity: Pros and cons of synthetic stands and across-site comparisons in established forests (2009, background): “There is evidence that neighbourhood effects are species-specific in mixed forests (Stoll & Newbery, 2005).”