A Bioeconomic Model of Marine Reserve Creation
By J. Sanchirico, J. Wilen. 2001
356 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/901ba6a891485bbd2008dee3e8f07d889ed6672b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
- Elizabeth A. Fulton
- Anthony D. M. Smith
- C. Costello
- Stephen Polasky
- André E. Punt
- Kathleen Segerson
- Michel J. Kaiser
- F. Smith
In Global and Planetary Change
- Elizabeth A. Fulton
- J. Thorson
- Kathleen Segerson
- C. Costello
- Anthony D. M. Smith
- André E. Punt
- J. Kritzer
- Olivier Thébaud
Citations in the corpus
- Integrating Ecology and Economics in the Study of Ecosystem Services: Some Lessons Learned (2009, background): “In a series of papers, Sanchirico & Wilen (1999, 2001, 2005) developed a bioeconomic model with distinct habitat patches and dispersal of a harvested species between patches.”
- Multispecies fisheries management and conservation: tactical applications using models of intermediate complexity (2014, background): “Further development can rely on conceptual approaches that are already well established, including the bio-economics of harvesting predator-prey systems (Hannesson 1983; Flaaten 1998; Sanchirico and Wilen 2001; Boncoeur et al. 2002), or the inclusion of habitat impacts of fishing in bio-economic mod”
- A simple bioeconomic model of a marine reserve (2000, background): “Thus Hannesson (1998) includes discrete as well as continuous time, which allows season length to be studied; Sanchirico and Wilen (1996, 2000) consider source-sink as well as density-dependent systems of migration; and Conrad (1999) extends Homans and Wilen’s (1997) model of regulated open access…”
- Are marine protected areas a red herring or fisheries panacea (2005, background): “Given the unknown social and variable predicted economic consequences of a switch to management based on MPAs (Sanchiro and Wilen 2001), one has to ask what is supposedly wrong with current fishery management tech-”
- Effects of Noncompliance on the Success of Alternative Designs of Marine Protected‐Area Networks for Conservation and Fisheries Management (2004, methodology): “…assume complete displacement of fishing effort into open areas after implementation of the MPA (e.g., Polachek 1990; Demartini 1993; Guenette & Pitcher 1999; Sladek Nowlis & Roberts 1999; Crowder et al. 2000; Pezzey et al. 2000; Sanchirico & Wilen 2001; Gerber et al. 2002; Lockwood et al. 2002).”
- Optimal harvesting of stochastic spatial resources (2008, methodology): “Spatial models of resource harvest include seminal contributions by Clark [5], Brown and Roughgarden [2], and Sanchirico and Wilen [39]; we review this literature in Section 1.”
- Models and indicators for assessing conservation and fisheries-related effects of marine protected areas (2008, neutral): “…models make assumptions about larval dispersion schemes, considering local dynamics in each patch; they enable exploring no-take reserve designs in terms of number, size and location in source versus sink patches (e.g. Crowder et al. 2000; Tuck and Possingham 2000; Sanchirico and Wilen 2001).”