Are marine protected areas a red herring or fisheries panacea

By Michel J. Kaiser. 2005

176 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/511baa1d28edda4a1da0ab1c5cc8ef3db2d50963

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. Peter J. S. Jones
2. H. Reiss
3. Vanessa Stelzenmüller
4. Andy South
5. Argyro Zenetos
6. G. Chust
7. I. Kröncke
8. Stelios Katsanevakis

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Stelios Katsanevakis
2. Argyro Zenetos
3. Peter J. S. Jones
4. Tatiana Filatova
5. Kate R. Johnson
6. S. Kerr
7. Vanessa Stelzenmüller
8. Andy South

Citations in the corpus

• A conceptual framework for the integral management of marine protected areas (2009, unknown): “However, many authors argue that MPAs are not a fishery panacea [31] basically because few data sustain positively their potential to promote sustainable fish stock yields.”
• Ecosystem-based marine spatial management: Review of concepts, policies, tools, and critical issues (2011, background): “…challenged by many authors arguing that conventional fisheries management approaches are more effective and MPAs might lead to reduced fish stock production due to densitydependent factors and reallocation of fishing effort (Kaiser, 2005; Norse et al., 2003; Shipp, 2003; Steele and Beet, 2003).”