Predictive data mining in clinical medicine: Current issues and guidelines

By Riccardo Bellazzi, Blaz Zupan. 2008

870 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BACKGROUND The widespread availability of new computational methods and tools for data analysis and predictive modeling requires medical informatics researchers and practitioners to systematically select the most appropriate strategy to cope with clinical prediction problems. In particular, the collection of methods known as 'data mining' offers methodological and technical solutions to deal with the analysis of medical data and construction of prediction models. A large variety of these methods requires general and simple guidelines that may help practitioners in the appropriate selection of data mining tools, construction and validation of predictive models, along with the dissemination of predictive models within clinical environments. PURPOSE The goal of this review is to discuss the extent and role of the research area of predictive data mining and to propose a framework to cope with the problems of constructing, assessing and exploiting data mining models in clinical medicine. METHODS We review the recent relevant work published in the area of predictive data mining in clinical medicine, highlighting critical issues and summarizing the approaches in a set of learned lessons. RESULTS The paper provides a comprehensive review of the state of the art of predictive data mining in clinical medicine and gives guidelines to carry out data mining studies in this field. CONCLUSIONS Predictive data mining is becoming an essential instrument for researchers and clinical practitioners in medicine. Understanding the main issues underlying these methods and the application of agreed and standardized procedures is mandatory for their deployment and the dissemination of results. Thanks to the integration of molecular and clinical data taking place within genomic medicine, the area has recently not only gained a fresh impulse but also a new set of complex problems it needs to address.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, Health Information Management

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Andreas Holzinger
  2. Lars Juhl Jensen
  3. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui
  4. Simon D. Smith
  5. Ping Wang
  6. Chandan K. Reddy
  7. Yan Li
  8. Hadi Banaee

In Health Informatics

  1. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui
  2. Simon D. Smith
  3. Chandan K. Reddy
  4. Yan Li
  5. Ping Wang
  6. Hadi Banaee
  7. Mobyen Uddin Ahmed
  8. Amy Loutfi

In Health Information Management

  1. Lars Juhl Jensen
  2. D. Ahiaga-Dagbui
  3. Simon D. Smith
  4. Chandan K. Reddy
  5. Yan Li
  6. Ping Wang
  7. Hadi Banaee
  8. Mobyen Uddin Ahmed

Citations in the corpus