Conservation assessment and prioritization of areas in Northeast India: Priorities for amphibians and reptiles

By Samraat Pawar, Michelle S. Koo, C. Kelley, M. F. Ahmed, S. Chaudhuri, Sahotra Sarkar. 2007

167 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9000e6dfeb31b671aa53d40144c0fe1350dc5257

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

Sampling bias and the use of ecological niche modeling in conservation planning: a field evaluation in a biodiversity hotspot (2010, result): “This result confirms recent successful applications of ENM in conservation (Domı́nguez-Domı́nguez et al. 2006; Garcia 2006; Pawar et al. 2007).”
Species Distribution Modeling in the Tropics: Problems, Potentialities, and the Role of Biological Data for Effective Species Conservation (2009, methodology): “…et al. 1999; Tourenq et al. 2001; Berry et al. 2002; Worner and Gevrey 2006), support vector machines (Drake et al. 2006), maximum entropy models (MAXENT, Graham and Hijmans 2006; Guisan et al. 2007; Sérgio et al. 2007; Pawar et al. 2007), and boosted regression trees (BRT, Guisan et al. 2007).”
Climate‐based models of spatial patterns of species richness in Egypt’s butterfly and mammal fauna (2009, background): “In contrast to the findings for many other countries and taxonomic groups (e.g. Evans et al., 2006; Pawar et al., 2007; Traba et al., 2007), Egypt’s protected areas network seems to be effective in representing butterfly and mammal diversity.”
Will climate change reduce the efficacy of protected areas for amphibian conservation in Italy (2011, background): “Despite the imperilled status of amphibians, these vertebrates are not as well represented in conservation studies as are other, less threatened taxonomic groups (Brito, 2008) and are often neglected during conservation planning (Rodrigues et al., 2004; Pawar et al., 2007).”
Using subsets of species in biodiversity surveys (2007, background): “Importantly, surrogates of species richness or composition, especially correlations across distinct taxonomic groups, are often used to justify large-scale conservation actions (Moritz et al. 2001; Oertli et al. 2005; Grenyer et al. 2006; Lamoreux et al. 2006; Pawar et al. 2007).”
Status of a protected area system in the Hindu Kush-Himalayas: An analysis of PA coverage (2008, background): “For example, recent surveys (Mishra et al. 2004, Pawar et al. 2006, 2007) revealed that many of the important wildlife Protected area status in the Hindu Kush-Himalyas Chettri et al. International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management 173 habitats in the northeastern Indian states of the…”