Sampling bias and the use of ecological niche modeling in conservation planning: a field evaluation in a biodiversity hotspot

239 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Unprotecting the rare species: a niche‐based gap analysis for odonates in a core Cerrado area (2011, methodology): “Secondly, advances in species distribution modelling have provided an excellent methodology for filling in the gaps in the knowledge of species distribution and optimizing the use of limited distributional data in an effective conservation approach (Peterson & Kluza, 2003; Raxworthy et al., 2003; Co”
Comparative analysis of diversity and environmental niches of soil bacterial, archaeal, fungal and protist communities reveal niche divergences along environmental gradients in the Alps (2021, background): “planning (Costa et al., 2010; Schwartz, 2012), biological invasions (Guisan et al.”
Crop wild relatives of pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.]: Distributions, ex situ conservation status, and potential genetic resources for abiotic stress tolerance (2015, methodology): “We chose Maxent due to its wide application in predicting species distributions (Elith et al., 2006; Costa et al., 2010; Phillips and Dudik, 2008).”
The importance of biotic interactions in species distribution models: a test of the Eltonian noise hypothesis using parrots (2014, background): “, 2010), SDM has demonstrated considerable predictive value (e.g. Feria et al., 2002; Raxworthy et al., 2003; Elith et al., 2006; Costa et al., 2010).”