Integrating Landscape and Metapopulation Modeling Approaches: Viability of the Sharp‐Tailed Grouse in a Dynamic Landscape

By H. Resit Akçakaya, Volker C. Radeloff, David J. Mladenoff, Hong S. He. 2004

196 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8fd80cc14c9946b308e65723d324a825af685a01

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The role of metapopulations in conservation (2007, unknown): “A recently developed approach addresses these issues by linking a landscape model and a metapopulation model ( Akcakaya et al. 2003b, 2004, 2005 ).”
Predicting extinction risks under climate change: coupling stochastic population models with dynamic bioclimatic habitat models (2008, background): “For example, Akçakaya et al. (2004) found that species persistence in a changing landscape depends on the balance between the rate of appearance and spatial arrangement of habitat patches, as well as the species' capacity for reproduction and dispersal.”
The influence of tree age and microhabitat quality on the occurrence of crustose lichens associated with old oaks (2008, methodology): “With increasing awareness of its importance, habitat quality has been incorporated into more recent metapopulation models (e.g. Hanski & Ovaskainen 2000; Akçakaya et al. 2004).”
In search of forage: predicting dynamic habitats of Mongolian gazelles using satellite-based estimates of vegetation productivity (2008, unknown): “Journal compilation © 2007 British Ecological Society Blackwell Publishing Ltd In search of forage: predicting dynamic habitats of Mongolian gazelles using satellite-based estimates of vegetation productivity”
Pragmatic population viability targets in a rapidly changing world (2010, unknown): “In reality, most populations presently exist as fragmented sub-populations within a larger meta-population (Akçakaya et al., 2004), with their successful conservation depending on genetic exchange among units to maintain high genetic diversity (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2008).”
Metapopulation dynamics and conservation of the marsh fritillary butterfly: Population viability analysis and management options for a critically endangered species in Western Europe (2005, background): “…recent PVAs on another butterfly species (Lopinga achine SCOPOLI: Bergman and Kindvall, 2004) and on a grouse species (Tympanuchus phasianellus L.: Akçakaya et al., 2004), our PVA illustrates the importance of taking into account landscape dynamics to provide sound guidelines for the long-term…”
Species in a dynamic world: Consequences of habitat network dynamics on conservation planning (2012, unknown): “V an Teeffelen et al./Biological Conservation 153 (2012) 239– 253 Poos and Jackson (2011) Lowe (2002) ± ± Akçakaya et al. (2004) + ± + McCarthy and Lindenmayer (1999) + Ross et al. (2008) + + + 0 McCarthy and Lindenmayer (2000) + Litvaitis and Villafuerte (1996) Tews et al. (2007) + + Reed (2004) +…”
Small mammal responses to environmental change: integrating past and present dynamics (2014, background): “Efforts to incorporate ecological and evolutionary processes, as well as management practices, directly into conservation planning are increasing (e.g., Akcakaya et al. 2004; Klein et al. 2009), but are often data intensive and context- or system-specific.”
Conservation Planning and Biodiversity: Assembling the Best Data for the Job (2004, background): “See Carroll et al. (2003) and Akçakaya et al. (2004) for examples.”
Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography (2010, methodology): “…described in the previous section (Landscape Disturbance and Community Dynamics) have been used to provide maps of suitable habitat at different time steps (Akçakaya et al., 2004, 2005) when habitat suitability is linked to community dynamics driven by natural disturbance (Regan et al., 2010).”