The process audit.
By M. Hammer. Harvard Business Review, 2007
599 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8fcdd09abb2e01942df75c3475452d9a9a4e76a9
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Maximilian Röglinger
- Jens Pöppelbuß
- Michael Rosemann
- Jan vom Brocke
- Jörg Becker
- Peter B. Seddon
- Song Yang
- Cheryl Calvert
Citations in the corpus
- A Multi-Project Model of Key Factors Affecting Organizational Benefits from Enterprise Systems (2010, background): “…literature on total quality management (TQM) (Garvin 1988; Samson and Terziovski 1999; Walton 1986), business process reengineering (Davenport 1993; Hammer 1996, 2007; Hammer and Champy 1993), and today’s SixSigma projects (Breyfogle 2003), all argue that process improvement is an important way to…”
- What makes a useful maturity model? a framework of general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management (2011, methodology): “2008) as well as Hammer’s (2007) Process and Enterprise Maturity Model (PEMM) for our review.”
- Maturity models in business process management (2012, methodology): “3: As regards the target group-oriented adoption methodology, Hammer (2007) is one of the few who gives explanations on how to use the PEMM for a prescriptive purpose of use.”
- The Six Core Elements of Business Process Management (2015, background): “Hammer (2007), likewise, adopts a prescriptive approach (the “Process Audit”) defining a number of process and enterprise competencies.”