Polarity sensitivity as (non) veridical dependency

By Anastasia Giannakidou. 2000

694 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8fc06a9bfc11aa569af29213c0913a0c75aa71ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention (2013, methodology): “by Giannakidou 2006b). Von Fintel’s basic point is that presuppositional elements are context-dependent items: they require that their presuppositions be met in their context of use. Their context dependency must be taken into consideration in assessing entailment relations. Let us start with the ex”
Lexicon-Based Methods for Sentiment Analysis (2011, background): “NPIs occur in negative sentences, but also in nonveridical contexts (Zwarts 1995; Giannakidou 1998), which also affect semantic orientation.”
Only, Emotive Factive Verbs, and the Dual Nature of Polarity Dependency (2006, methodology): “Yes/no (polar) questions are nonveridical, though not DE, because they are akin to disjunctions (Giannakidou 2002), and disjunctions are nonveridical (as opposed to conjunctions; Zwarts 1995) thus licensing PIs (see Giannakidou 1998).”
The Pragmatics of Polarity (2004, background): “…out the notion of affectivity (Hoeksema 1983, 1986; Heim 1984; Kadmon & Landman 1993; Kas 1993; Dowty 1994; Zwarts 1996a, b; van der Wouden 1994; Giannakidou 1998); syntactic accounts, on the other hand, focus less on the variety of licensors and more on the syntactic relations which must hold…”
The Syntax and Semantics of Unselected Embedded Questions (2001, methodology): “We tentatively suggest that this begins to provide a universal typology of polarity-sensitive determiners that occur in clauses as well as in nominals, a conclusion that backs up recent work on the crosslinguistic semantic of polarity-sensitive elements (see Giannakidou 1998).”
Covert Modality in Non-finite Contexts (2006, background): “Lacking infinitives, however, Greek employs other forms that are used for functions the infinitive is used for in English– the subjunctive na (for arguments that na is actually the subjunctive and earlier references, see Giannakidou 1998).”
Mood and gradability: an investigation of the subjunctive mood in Spanish (2008, background): “…Non-assertion (Bolinger 1968; Terrell and Hooper 1974; Hooper 1975; Panzeri 2002, 2003; Schlenker 2005), Strong Intensionality (Farkas 1985, 1992, 2003), Non-Veridicality (Giannakidou 1997, 1998, 1999), Model Shift (Quer 1998), Modality (Giorgi and Pianesi 1997; Portner 1992, 1997), and many more.”
Negation, Polarity, and Deontic Modals (2013, background): “2 Giannakidou (1998) takes chriazete to be a negative polarity item.”
Predicting the presuppositions of soft triggers (2011, background): “(Geurts 1994) Possibly, what is happening here is that the adverb makes the entire stretch of time signaled by recently the main point of the utterance.”