Only, Emotive Factive Verbs, and the Dual Nature of Polarity Dependency
By Anastasia Giannakidou. 2006
149 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/87ec422f448680faf7451b0389bf1f65dde9323c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Language and Linguistics
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
Citations in the corpus
- NPI any and connected exceptive phrases (2008, background): “(On this contrast see Atlas (1993), Nathan (1999), Giannakidou (2006) , a.o.)”
- The landscape of EVEN (2007, background): “8 There is a systematic difference between Greek and English minimizers, observed elsewhere (Baker, 1970, Giannakidou, 1999, 2006): the former are strict NPIs appearing only with antiveridical licensers, whereas the latter have a much freer distribution, hence the difference here in status between…”
- Speaker-oriented adverbs (2009, unknown): “This paper will support the (non)veridicality approach to polarity developed by Giannakidou (1999, 2001, 2006, 2007) by showing that the analysis of SpOAs crucially depends on their being positive polarity items (following the basic idea of Nilsen 2004), and that the (non)veridicality theory…”
- Association by movement: evidence from NPI-licensing (2007, background): “Giannakidou (2006) claims that ‘even’ is SDE since it has an existential presupposition, but this is not correct, as the example presented in (17) illustrates.”