Boundary Cues for 3D Object Shape Recovery

By Kevin Karsch, Zicheng Liao, Jason Rock, Jonathan T. Barron, Derek Hoiem. 2013

31 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Early work in computer vision considered a host of geometric cues for both shape reconstruction and recognition. However, since then, the vision community has focused heavily on shading cues for reconstruction, and moved towards data-driven approaches for recognition. In this paper, we reconsider these perhaps overlooked "boundary" cues (such as self occlusions and folds in a surface), as well as many other established constraints for shape reconstruction. In a variety of user studies and quantitative tasks, we evaluate how well these cues inform shape reconstruction (relative to each other) in terms of both shape quality and shape recognition. Our findings suggest many new directions for future research in shape reconstruction, such as automatic boundary cue detection and relaxing assumptions in shape from shading (e.g. orthographic projection, Lambertian surfaces).

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Geology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Abhinav Kumar Gupta
  2. Jitendra Malik
  3. Martial Hebert
  4. Shubham Tulsiani
  5. David F. Fouhey
  6. X. Wang
  7. Sara Alexandra Gomes Vicente
  8. Abhishek Kar

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Jitendra Malik
  2. Luc Van Gool
  3. Abhinav Kumar Gupta
  4. Andrea Vedaldi
  5. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  6. Trevor Darrell
  7. Dacheng Tao
  8. Andrew Zisserman

In Geology

  1. Jitendra Malik
  2. Abhinav Kumar Gupta
  3. X. Wang
  4. David F. Fouhey
  5. Martial Hebert
  6. Shubham Tulsiani
  7. Abhishek Kar
  8. João Carreira

Citations in the corpus