Productivity Growth and Pollution in State Manufacturing
By William L. Weber, Bruce R. Domazlicky. Review of Economics and Statistics, 2001
110 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f400171702c06fca09b9afc037c47852b87896c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Dong-hyun Oh
- William L. Weber
- Ning Zhang
- Peng Zhou
- Shawna Grosskopf
- Yongrok Choi
- Beng Wah Ang
- Limin Du
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Dong-hyun Oh
- William L. Weber
- Peng Zhou
- Shawna Grosskopf
- Ning Zhang
- Beng Wah Ang
- Yongrok Choi
- Roman Matousek
Citations in the corpus
- A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index (2010, unknown): “Weber and Domazlicky (2001) apply the same methodology to investigate the productivity growth in the US manufacturing sector for the period 1988–1994 in order to incorporate toxic release into the productivity analysis.”
- Does Environmental Protection Lead to Slower Productivity Growth in the Chemical Industry? (2004, background): “Weber and Domazlicky (2001) use aggregate state data for the manufacturing industry accounting for toxic releases during 1988–1994 and find that when toxic releases are accounted for, inefficiency is lower and productivity growth is greater, than when toxic releases are ignored.”
- A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index (2010, methodology): “Weber and Domazlicky (2001) apply the same methodology to investigate productivity growth in the US manufacturing sector for the period 1988–1994 in order to incorporate toxic release into the productivity analysis.”
- Shadow prices and pollution costs in U.S. agriculture (2006, background): “Weber and Domazlicky (2001) use directional output distance functions to measure productivity growth in the U.S. manufacturing sector accounting for toxic releases in manufacturing.”
- A sequential Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index : Environmentally sensitive productivity growth considering the progressive nature of technology (2010, unknown): “Weber and Domazlicky (2001) apply the same methodology to investigate productivity growth in the US manufacturing sector for the period 1988–1994 in order to incorporate toxic release into the productivity analysis.”