Shadow prices and pollution costs in U.S. agriculture

282 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On estimating shadow prices of undesirable outputs with efficiency models: A literature review (2014, background): “[39] A Human-risk leaching, runoff of pesticides Agricultural sector, U.”
A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index (2010, background): “[ 11 ] and [7] specify the output distance function in a translog form, and [10], [12], [13] and [4] utilized”
An empirical analysis of the CO2 shadow price in Chinese thermal power enterprises (2013, background): “…the latter can allow for a simultaneous expansion of good outputs and contraction of bad outputs.1 This feature of the directional distance function fulfills policymakers' general preference to reduce pollution, and provides a natural way of modeling the production process (Färe et al., 2006).”
Estimating the marginal abatement cost curve of CO2 emissions in China: Provincial panel data analysis (2015, background): “Related studies include Hartman et al. (1997) on the US, De Cara and Jayet (2011) on the EU, Dasgupta et al.”
Environmental technical efficiency, technology gap and shadow price of coal-fuelled power plants in China: A parametric meta-frontier analysis (2016, methodology): “2 This method is also widely used for environmental efficiency studies in other industries, such as agriculture (Färe et al., 2006), manufacturing (Lee and Zhang, 2012), and container glass industry (Boyd et al., 2002), etc. 3 The method of meta-frontier analysis has been widely used in other…”