Effects of Phalaris arundinacea and nitrate-N addition on the establishment of wetland plant communities
By Emily K. Green, S. Galatowitsch. 2002
209 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8f35bbe416ac31ea9efba15010dc3c8b43137c99
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- A comparison of invasive and non‐invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients (2004, result): “This pattern is consistent with the hypothesis that invasives are faster growers that are able to acquire resources quickly (e.g. Melastomataceae: Baruch et al., 2000; Phalaris: Green & Galatowitsch, 2002; but see Cleverly et al., 1997).”
- Invasive species: “back-seat drivers” of ecosystem change? (2012, unknown): “However, extreme difficulties in managing this species and its competitive abilities across a range of conditions suggest that Phalaris has some ability to drive declines and limit recovery of native species following invasion (Green and Galatowitsch 2002; Healy and Zedler 2010).”
- Biological consequences of invasion by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) (2009, result): “These results concur with previous controlled studies or experimental manipulations of RCG dominance (Green and Galatowitsch 2002; Kercher and Zedler 2004; Kercher et al. 2007), as well as spatial comparisons (Houlahan and Findlay 2004; Meier 2004; Perkins and Wilson 2005; Schooler et al. 2006),…”
- Negative per capita effects of purple loosestrife and reed canary grass on plant diversity of wetland communities (2006, background): “In addition, experimental studies document the ability of both invaders to decrease plant diversity (Weiher et al., 1996; Green & Galatowitsch, 2002; Kercher & Zedler, 2004).”
- What is the impact of Impatiens glandulifera on species diversity of invaded riparian vegetation (2006, background): “It has been suggested that the balance between the performance of native and invasive species can be shifted towards the latter by an increased trophic level of the site (Daehler, 2003; Green and Galatowitsch, 2002).”
- Increasing the Effectiveness of Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) Control in Wet Meadow Restorations (2006, background): “Increased nitrogen availability favors P. arundinacea over natives (Green & Galatowitsch 2002; Kercher & Zedler 2004; Perry et al. 2004).”
- Beyond control : wider implications for the management of biological invasions (2006, background): “…is thought to contribute to the increasing colonization and dominance of IAS in wetlands because the growth of these species responds to a greater extent to nutrient addition than co-occurring natives, and as a result the latter are displaced (Green & Galatowitsch 2002; Rickey & Anderson 2004).”
- Reed Canary Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) as a Biological Model in the Study of Plant Invasions (2004, methodology): “To test the effect of nitrate enrichment and RCG presence on the establishment of native sedge meadows communities of prairie pothole region of mid-continental North America, Green and Galatowitsch (2001, 2002) grew experimental sedge meadow communities from seed in greenhouse microcosms (12 and 11 ”
- How tussocks structure sedge meadow vegetation (2006, result): “…why P. arundinacea did not reduce species richness, as found in many other studies (Wetzel and van der Valk 1998, Budelsky and Galatowitsch 2000, Green and Galatowitsch 2001, 2002, Maurer and Zedler 2002, Miller and Zedler 2003, Houlahan and Findlay 2004, Kercher and Zedler 2004, Lavergne and…”
- Causes and Consequences of Invasive Plants in Wetlands: Opportunities, Opportunists, and Outcomes (2004, background): “Green and Galatowitsch (2002) showed increases in P.”